Skip to main content
UUraikkal

Deliverables

See what your team receives — not only what the platform does.

Review the governance, engineering, deployment, testing and reporting artifacts Uraikkal produces throughout an AI governance engagement, shown for one sample organisation: Acme Corp.

Illustrative sample data — not a real customerClick any preview to expand it

For CISOs and security leadership

Posture, readiness, and the decisions still waiting on someone.

Leadership Presentation

A leadership-ready summary — readiness snapshot, top gaps, and the roadmap — built from the same workflow, no separate deck to assemble.

Primary audience
Leadership
ciso-presentation — sampleLive

Prepared for Acme Corp

Readiness snapshot

Channel CoverageDeveloping
EnforcementNeeds work
GovernanceOn track
Tool ReadinessDeveloping

Also produced

  • Executive Governance Report

    Where the AI governance programme stands, in language a board paper can quote.

  • AI Risk & Posture Summary

    Concentrations of risk across the application estate, and what is driving them.

  • Readiness Assessment

    How close the programme is to enforcing its own policy, and what is still missing.

  • Key Decisions & Open Risks

    The decisions still waiting on a human, with the risk of leaving each one open.

  • Implementation Progress Report

    Deployment and validation status against the plan that was signed off.

For governance and risk teams

The register of what was decided, by whom, and on what basis.

AI Governance

Your GenAI apps grouped into governance categories, with in-scope status and the rationale behind each classification.

Primary audience
Governance and security
app-governance — sampleLive

Acme Corp — AI Governance

  • Azure AI Foundry

    AI Analytics

    Medium Risk

  • GitHub Copilot

    AI Code Assistant

    Medium Risk

  • Microsoft Copilot (M365)

    Enterprise AI Assistant

    Medium Risk

Also produced

  • Governance Framework

    How applications are reviewed, categorised, approved, restricted and re-reviewed.

  • Risk Assessment Records

    The evidence behind each application's risk rating, kept with the decision it informed.

  • Decision Rationale

    Why each application landed in its category — the answer to "who approved this, and on what basis?"

  • Review & Approval History

    Who changed a governance decision, when, and what it was before.

  • Exception Register

    Approved deviations from the standard control model, with owner and expiry.

For security architects

The control model and the design documents that have to survive review.

Control Matrix

Risk families against governance categories — each cell an explicit DLP action your team chose, from Allow to Block.

Primary audience
Governance and security
control-matrix — sampleLive

Acme Corp — Control Matrix

Risk familyApprovedConditionalRestricted
Credentials, Keys & SecretsBlockBlockBlock
Regulated DataMonitorCoach + Just.Block
Source CodeAllowMonitorCoach + Ack.
Intellectual PropertyMonitorCoach + Just.Block

Approved = Approved & Supported · Conditional = Approved with Conditions · Restricted = Restricted / Unassessed

Policy Blueprints

A vendor-neutral translation of your matrix: policy intent, grouping, source/destination logic, data profiles, activities, and expected actions.

Primary audience
DLP architect / engineer
policy-blueprint — sampleLive

Acme Corp — Policy Blueprints

  • Block secrets everywhereBlock

    activities: upload · prompt

  • Protect regulated dataCoach

    activities: upload

  • Coach on customer dataCoach

    activities: prompt

  • Alert on source code uploadsAlert

    activities: upload

HLD / LLD

Design documents your reviewers recognise: a high-level design for stakeholders and a low-level build sheet for the engineer configuring the tenant.

Primary audience
Architect / DLP engineer
hld-lld-summary — sampleLive

HLD — Acme Corp

  1. 01Executive Summary
  2. 02Governance Model & App Categories
  3. 03Policy Architecture
  4. 04Coaching & User Experience
  5. 05Risks & Mitigations
  6. 06Rollout Strategy

LLD — Acme Corp

  1. 01Policy Build Sheet
  2. 02Policy Order & Evaluation
  3. 03DLP Profile Mapping
  4. 04Required Objects
  5. 05Deployment Ledger
  6. 06Validation Test Plan

Also produced

  • Platform Boundary Document

    What the security platform can and cannot enforce, stated before the design depends on it.

  • Assumptions & Limitations

    Every assumption the recommendation rests on, and the known platform limits that constrain it.

  • Required Integration Model

    The identity, logging and tenant integrations the design expects to be in place.

For DLP and CASB engineers

Everything needed to build the policies in the console without guessing.

Netskope Policy Pack

The recommended Netskope policy set in evaluation order — access blocks, global secrets protection, per-tier content controls, and a fallback for the unassessed long tail.

Primary audience
DLP engineer
netskope-policy-pack — sampleLive

Acme Corp — Netskope tenant

  • P100Prohibited Applications — Access Blockblock
  • P200Secrets & Keys — Global Blockblock
  • P210Scoped — Corporate Copilot Tenant (Finance)protect
  • P295AI Acceptable Use Reminder — Approved & Supportedcoach
  • P300Approved & Supported — Content Protectioncoach

Deployment Checklist

Every step to stand the pack up correctly — DLP profiles, app objects, notification templates, identity, and validation — tracked to completion.

Primary audience
DLP engineer
deployment-checklist — sampleLive

Acme Corp — deployment tracker

  • Create DLP Profiles43/43
  • Confirm App Objects5/5
  • Verify User Identity3/3
  • Notification Templates8/12
  • Validation Checks2/4

Also produced

  • DLP Profile Requirements

    Which DLP profile backs each content rule, and the detection it has to perform.

  • Policy Order

    Evaluation sequence and continue/stop behaviour per policy — the part that silently breaks enforcement when it's wrong.

  • Required Object List

    App tags, instances, groups, URL lists and templates that must exist before a policy will save.

  • Notification Templates

    The coaching, justification and block messages end users actually see.

For testing and operations

Proof that the controls behave as designed, and a clean handover.

Testing Plan

Test scenarios mapped to each policy, split into must-pass and good-to-verify, with expected outcomes ready to record against.

Primary audience
Tester / project team
testing-plan — sampleLive

Acme Corp — Testing Plan

35/35must-pass
8/11recommended

Sample records

  • DLP-001Navigate to a prohibited GenAI app from a test account○ Pending
  • DLP-002Upload a file containing Credentials, Keys & Secrets to any GenAI app✓ Passed
  • DLP-003Paste an API key into an approved AI chat prompt✓ Passed
  • DLP-004Upload a file containing Source Code to Generative AI✓ Passed
  • DLP-005Upload a .pem file to a Restricted / Unassessed GenAI app✓ Passed

Evidence Report

Captured results per test — expected vs actual, pass/fail, tester, and date — the proof security leaders and auditors ask for.

Primary audience
Auditor / security leader
evidence-report — sampleLive

Acme Corp — GenAI DLP Evidence Report

35/35must-pass
8/11recommended
  • DLP-001Prohibited GenAI app accessPassed
  • DLP-002Credentials upload blockedPassed
  • DLP-003Source code upload blockedPassed
  • DLP-004Regulated data upload blockedPassed

Also produced

  • Test Data Requirements

    What each scenario needs to exercise a control honestly, without production data.

  • Expected Outcomes

    The result each test must produce for the control to count as working.

  • Evidence Checklist

    What has to be captured per test for the result to stand up in an audit.

  • Operational Handover

    What the run team inherits: exceptions, review cadence, and the things to watch.

Metadata

Every preview, at a glance.

OutputAudiencePrimary reader
AI GovernanceGovernance & riskGovernance and security
Control MatrixArchitectsGovernance and security
Policy BlueprintsArchitectsDLP architect / engineer
Netskope Policy PackEngineersDLP engineer
Deployment ChecklistEngineersDLP engineer
Testing PlanTesting & opsTester / project team
Evidence ReportTesting & opsAuditor / security leader
HLD / LLDArchitectsArchitect / DLP engineer
Leadership PresentationLeadershipLeadership

Take it with you

Sample Policy Pack

The Control Matrix, Netskope Policy Pack, Testing Plan, Evidence Report, Deployment Checklist, and Limitations & Risks for Acme Corp, bundled into one document — illustrative sample data, structured exactly like what Uraikkal generates for your own environment.

Download the Sample Policy Pack

Next sample

Sample Governance Pack

A second downloadable sample covering the governance side of an engagement — the application register, governance framework, decision rationale and exception register — in the same format as the policy pack above.

In preparation

Want these generated for your environment?

Customers receive every artifact above, built from their own governance decisions.

Request Read-Only AccessExplore the Platform